Сеедно, веќе има лепенка ролекс на него, убав е, ама сеуште попрво би земал Омега. Ако гледаме така, на пример Diesel имаат убав дизајн на некои часовници и Fossil исто и ред други, ама според мене тоа не се часовници со вредност. Брендот го прави часовникот, ако брендот е познат по правење фармерки, мене тој саат автоматски ми отпаѓа, исто и Ролекс се познати по злато и дијаманти и раперски спотови, мене автоматски ми отпаѓаат од конкуренција.
Што се однесува до
сертификатот(малку постара статија):
Omega is currently the #2 producer of COSC certified chronometers in the entire world (207,668 produced in 2003 according to the FH News Page). This distinction is, I feel one of the factors which adds to the mystique and aura of owning an Omega watch – clearly they are committed to excellence. By producing such a high volume of watches which are able to attain COSC certification, they are demonstrating their commitment to producing the most accurate, robust watch movements the Swiss watch industry has to offer.
Понатаму наидов на текстови дека ЦОСЦ сертификатот дел од производителите (меѓу кои и Омега) решаваат да го отфрлат и да прејдат на друг тип на тестирање и сертифицирање, има и други сертификациони тела кои подлабински тестираат, за разлика од ЦОСЦ, за кој пишува дека се претворил во маркетинг тул.
Нејсе, како што пиша и Зеро, за жал, таква е состојбата со Ролекс, еден ден кога и Омега ке почнат да прават златни саати, ке речам дека се тиња.
На крај од сето ова, кажете ми од каде да најдам 5600 евра и да станам сопственик на Омега Спидмастер Профешнал?
П.С. Па и Џемс Бонд носи Омега...најчесто...
Едит:
Еве околу новата
сертификација.
Низ текстот вели:
Currently at COSC – and we explained this in detail before a couple of times – only movements are being tested in various temperatures and positions and need to meet the requirement of -4/+6 seconds deviation per day on average.
Other brands like Patek Philippe, Jaeger-LeCoultre a.o. have their own rigid ways of testing and monitoring the performance of their watches and giving them a quality seal (PP seal and the 1000 Hour Control seal from JLC).
Where COSC was only used to proof the accuracy of a watch, the new “Officially Certified” label on the dial will proof a couple of things more:
- the function of each movement when exposed to magnetic fields greater than 15,000 gauss;
- the function of each watch (!!) when exposed to magnetic fields greater than 15,000 gauss;
- average daily precision (different positions and temperatures) between 0 and +5 seconds a day (before and after being exposed to magnetic fields > 15,000 gauss);
- the power reserve (in hours) of a watch;
- water resistance (in water).
What will happen to COSC?
As you know, the brand that offers most movements for the Chronometer certification is Rolex. Omega is number two and Breitling comes third. After that, Swatch Group brands like Mido and Tissot also deliver their (large) share of movements for chronometer certification. Although Omega will reduce their number of movements offered to COSC for certification in the next coming years and have them ‘Officially Certified’ by METAS, there is still enough ground for COSC to keep on doing what they are doing.
Omega versus Rolex
Before, during and after the announcement in Geneva yesterday, many of the conversations I’ve heard immediately included Rolex. Is this a big ‘diss’ to Rolex by Omega? In my opinion is it merely a challenge for Rolex to come out of their shell (no pun intended) and show their ambition level and aim for innovation as well. However, I also sincerely believe that Omega did this for a far more important reason to have their watches ‘Officially Certified’, convincing consumers that Omega is capable of developing and selling good watches that will do what Omega promises them to do and keep on going for a lifetime.
